Top 10 Types of Cause Promotions
March 19, 2010 at 3:01 PM by Research & Insights

But not all cause-related promotions are alike. There are as many creative cause executions as there are consumer brands, each most successful when tailored to the unique product or service and target audience. To help get you started, Cone has identified 10 of the most common types of cause promotions to consider when developing your next program.
1. The “Proud Supporter” Method
This first promotion type describes when a company gives a flat donation to a cause/nonprofit organization, and the donation is not tied to sales of a product or action by the consumer. Cone refers to this as the “proud supporter” method because this language often accompanies this type of cause promotion on the package.
Example: General Mills* Pink Together campaign
Pro: Longer shelf life because it’s not directly tied to individual sales
Con: Passive consumer engagement – no compelling call-to-action to drive engagement
2. Donation with Purchase
Possibly the most common approach associated with cause-related promotions, this is when a donation is triggered for each specially marked package sold during a pre-determined timeframe. The donation may vary and may be described in terms of a percentage or dollar amount of each product. A funding cap is generally associated with this type of promotion.
Example: Betty Crocker Stirring Up Wishes* campaign
Pro: Opportunity to track sales and sales lift
Con: Requires careful disclosure to ensure consumers are not misled and promotion details are transparent (e.g., caps, timeframes, etc.)
3. Donation with Label or Coupon Redemption
This method is when a company makes a donation for every code/label provided through purchase and redeemed in-store or via mail. It is not the sale itself which triggers the donation, but the supplemental action.
Example: Yoplait Save Lids to Save Lives*
Pro: Ability to track consumer reaction to promotion and resulting sales lift
Con: Some consumers are dissuaded by need to take an “extra step”
4. Donation with Online Activation
Similar to the in-store redemption method, this is when a company makes a donation for every code/label provided through purchase and redeemed or activated online.
Example: Dawn Saves Wildlife
Pro: Convenient for consumers and offers second point of engagement
Con: Easy for consumers to forget to redeem code/label because it is not an immediate action
5. Donation with Consumer Action
A method that doesn’t require a purchase; the fifth type of promotion is when a company makes a donation when the consumer takes a specific action (e.g., sends a viral gift, hosts an event, designs packaging).
Example: Mike’s Hard Lemonade Share Some Pink campaign*
Pro: Compelling consumer call-to-action
Con: Less direct tie to sales
6. Dual Incentive Method
A dual incentive promotion is when a company provides an incentive to drive consumer donations (e.g., a donation match, a product coupon or discount).
Example: Lands End Big Warm Up campaign
Pro: Loyalty opportunity – consumers feel a partnership with the company and rewarded for their efforts
Con: Company can be perceived as asking consumers for money since a donation is required to activate the incentive
7. Consumer Pledge Drives
Some companies encourage consumers to pledge support to a social issue or nonprofit partner. This is often accompanied by a corporate donation or incentive for each pledge.
Example: Starbucks Pledge5 campaign
Pro: Gives consumer a voice
Con: Requires localization to ensure highest level of consumer relevance
8. Buy One, Give One (BOGO) Method
A promotion that is gaining in popularity, BOGO is when a donation by a company is communicated in terms of a comparable social impact (e.g., one pack = one vaccine; one dollar = one tree planted, one pair of shoes bought = one pair of shoes donated).
Example: Pampers’ 1 Pack = 1 Vaccine campaign
Pro: Consumers are very responsive to tangible, immediate results
Con: Difficult to translate outputs (# of vaccines) to outcomes (# of lives affected) and the actual cost of the individual item donated may be small (few cents)
9. Consumer-Directed Donation
This promotion allows consumers to determine where and how a company’s donation is allocated, either from a set list or by “nominating” favorite charities.
Example: Target Bullseye Gives campaign
Pro: Consumer is empowered – higher level of engagement and perceived value
Con: Can be resource-intensive to manage and vet multiple nonprofit beneficiaries
10. Volunteerism Rally
The final promotion encourages consumers to donate time in support of a social cause. They are rewarded for their volunteerism with complimentary goods/services.
Example: Disney’s Give a Day, Get a Disney Day campaign
Pro: Opportunity for localization and personalization
Con: High level of consumer commitment required
*Cone client
Tags: campaigns newmedia engagement donation causebranding
Did you like this post? Please share it:
Email Post
Comments
< back
Spring is in the air, and we are already seeing the next crop of cause-related efforts sprouting. This week, Betty Crocker (Cone client) launched the second year of its cause-related campaign “Stirring Up Wishes,” and AT&T announced a new tree planting initiative to encourage paperless billing. Creative product and service tie-ins such as these are a must-have in every cause marketer’s toolkit. Cause marketing can drive short-term sales, and when sustained over time, it can also enhance consumer trust and build brand loyalty.

1. The “Proud Supporter” Method
This first promotion type describes when a company gives a flat donation to a cause/nonprofit organization, and the donation is not tied to sales of a product or action by the consumer. Cone refers to this as the “proud supporter” method because this language often accompanies this type of cause promotion on the package.
Example: General Mills* Pink Together campaign
Pro: Longer shelf life because it’s not directly tied to individual sales
Con: Passive consumer engagement – no compelling call-to-action to drive engagement
2. Donation with Purchase
Possibly the most common approach associated with cause-related promotions, this is when a donation is triggered for each specially marked package sold during a pre-determined timeframe. The donation may vary and may be described in terms of a percentage or dollar amount of each product. A funding cap is generally associated with this type of promotion.
Example: Betty Crocker Stirring Up Wishes* campaign
Pro: Opportunity to track sales and sales lift
Con: Requires careful disclosure to ensure consumers are not misled and promotion details are transparent (e.g., caps, timeframes, etc.)
3. Donation with Label or Coupon Redemption
This method is when a company makes a donation for every code/label provided through purchase and redeemed in-store or via mail. It is not the sale itself which triggers the donation, but the supplemental action.
Example: Yoplait Save Lids to Save Lives*
Pro: Ability to track consumer reaction to promotion and resulting sales lift
Con: Some consumers are dissuaded by need to take an “extra step”
4. Donation with Online Activation
Similar to the in-store redemption method, this is when a company makes a donation for every code/label provided through purchase and redeemed or activated online.
Example: Dawn Saves Wildlife
Pro: Convenient for consumers and offers second point of engagement
Con: Easy for consumers to forget to redeem code/label because it is not an immediate action
5. Donation with Consumer Action
A method that doesn’t require a purchase; the fifth type of promotion is when a company makes a donation when the consumer takes a specific action (e.g., sends a viral gift, hosts an event, designs packaging).
Example: Mike’s Hard Lemonade Share Some Pink campaign*
Pro: Compelling consumer call-to-action
Con: Less direct tie to sales
6. Dual Incentive Method
A dual incentive promotion is when a company provides an incentive to drive consumer donations (e.g., a donation match, a product coupon or discount).
Example: Lands End Big Warm Up campaign
Pro: Loyalty opportunity – consumers feel a partnership with the company and rewarded for their efforts
Con: Company can be perceived as asking consumers for money since a donation is required to activate the incentive
7. Consumer Pledge Drives
Some companies encourage consumers to pledge support to a social issue or nonprofit partner. This is often accompanied by a corporate donation or incentive for each pledge.
Example: Starbucks Pledge5 campaign
Pro: Gives consumer a voice
Con: Requires localization to ensure highest level of consumer relevance
8. Buy One, Give One (BOGO) Method
A promotion that is gaining in popularity, BOGO is when a donation by a company is communicated in terms of a comparable social impact (e.g., one pack = one vaccine; one dollar = one tree planted, one pair of shoes bought = one pair of shoes donated).
Example: Pampers’ 1 Pack = 1 Vaccine campaign
Pro: Consumers are very responsive to tangible, immediate results
Con: Difficult to translate outputs (# of vaccines) to outcomes (# of lives affected) and the actual cost of the individual item donated may be small (few cents)
9. Consumer-Directed Donation
This promotion allows consumers to determine where and how a company’s donation is allocated, either from a set list or by “nominating” favorite charities.
Example: Target Bullseye Gives campaign
Pro: Consumer is empowered – higher level of engagement and perceived value
Con: Can be resource-intensive to manage and vet multiple nonprofit beneficiaries
10. Volunteerism Rally
The final promotion encourages consumers to donate time in support of a social cause. They are rewarded for their volunteerism with complimentary goods/services.
Example: Disney’s Give a Day, Get a Disney Day campaign
Pro: Opportunity for localization and personalization
Con: High level of consumer commitment required
*Cone client
Tags: campaigns newmedia engagement donation causebranding
Did you like this post? Please share it:
Email Post
Comments 
|
|
March 20, 2010 3:31 PM Great info |
|
|
March 21, 2010 12:03 PM Terrific article. We know from Cone's 2010 Nonprofit Marketing Trend Tracker report that corporate philanthropy is a winning situation for all those involved, and that these cause promotions are successful. However, is one type of cause promotion model more effective than another? Or does the outcome depend on the particular cause and and what the sponsor's marketing goal is? Thanks, Theresa |
|
|
March 22, 2010 11:41 AM Thanks for your comments, John and Theresa. The short answer to your question, Theresa, is yes, the outcome most certainly depends on the particular cause, company, audience and marketing objectives. There’s no “turnkey” approach for every situation, whether we are talking about a simple cause promotion to engage consumers and drive sales or a more robust cause branding commitment which engages consumers, employees and others in a long-term, multifaceted effort (from cause-related product ties to skills-based volunteerism to issue thought leadership and more). We’re seeing increasingly creative and complex opportunities for consumers to get engaged in the effort (by helping select the cause/beneficiary, for example), but over time, this will lose some luster as it’s more commonplace. Others may have more staying power, such as the dual-incentive. Consumers will almost always respond when there’s a combined social/selfish benefit to be had. But, no matter the particular execution, ultimately the most effective model is the one that is transparent, appropriately engages the right audience and makes a true commitment to the issue (versus just a “one-off” short-term approach). Thanks again, Sarah Kerkian, Cone |
|
|
March 25, 2010 9:36 PM Thanks for sharing. I love the fact that you are able to put together this list. I think you hit all of the main ones. I am looking to help with a non-profit and this gives me some great insight to choosing which way to go with fund raising. |
|
|
March 26, 2010 11:52 AM Glad you find it useful! Casey Brennan Insights Associate Cone |
|
|
March 26, 2010 12:46 PM Hi, Really great tips. I am a marketing professional working on new business development ventures for a non-profit in DC. You have helped me tie in new ways of positioning campaigns within traditional marketing frameworks. Thanks. |
|
|
May 25, 2010 7:57 PM Great stuff. I think these are all awesome ways to get people involved for a cause. No matter what way you choose it is great that people care enough to help others. Each situation will dictate the best option. |
< back

